x
Tell a Friend
  • captcha

Shoulder Ultrasound Scans

Ultrasound utilizes sound waves to produce images of the body. A transducer is placed on the skin, which generates high frequency sound. The sound penetrates the body and is returned as echoes at the interface of anatomic structures or areas of pathology. The echoes are received by the transducer and are combined to form an image. Ultrasound is particularly useful for muscle and tendon injuries, particularly of the shoulder.

The recent advances in technology have made Ultrasound machines small, light and accessible for surgeons and other clinicians. An ultrasound scan can be done at the first clinic visit and a diagnosis often made. However, the surgeon needs to have experience and training in using ultrasound to use it effectively

Portable Office Ultrasound, which is performed at the time of first consultation, offers the following advantages to patients:

  1. Immediate diagnosis and confirmation of the rotator cuff pathology, allowing:
    • One stop clinic, avoiding patients being sent away for a scan and then return a few weeks (or months) later with the result.
    • Management planning and listing for the appropriate surgery at that visit, thus reducing waiting time for surgery.
    • Patients to know their diagnosis immediately and plan accordingly.
  2. Allows therapists treating patient to manage accordingly
  3. Patient convenience
  4. Surgeon convenience
  5. Cheap – avoids cost of MRI and the radiology department costs.
  6. Quick
  7. Safe – no dangerous radiation
  8. Elimination of unnecessary injections – if a patient has a rotator cuff tear I would not inject the subacromial bursa with steroid usually.

This ‘One-stop clinic’ approach is popular with patients and is excellent for teaching purposes and honing clinical examination skills. 

Ultrasound is used as an extension of the normal examination (if required). We also use a technique of Dynamic Ultrasound to assess muscle bulk and movement.

Ultrasound can reveal many different diseases of the shoulder:

  • Subacromial Bursitis – when the bursa is too thick (more than 2 mm thick or clearly asymmetric with the asymptomatic shoulder)
  • Calcifications in the Cuff – These calcifications are of course almost always seen on the plain films. However, in some cases, they are missed because of their location (subscapularis calcifications) or direction of the x-ray beam. The appearance of the calcifications on ultrasound can predict their action on the symptomatology. Thin, long calcifications are often asymptomatic whereas thick, rounded or irregular calcifications give rise to symptoms. The amount of posterior attenuation can also predict the hardness of the calcifications, eventually helping when arthroscopic removal of the calcium deposits is considered for treatment.
  • Partial Rotator Cuff Tears – can also been depicted, although the accuracy is lower than for complete tears.
  • Complete Rotator Cuff Tears – are well seen with ultrasound.

In summary, office ultrasound is a quick imaging process for the diagnosis of soft tissue injuries. Performed at the first consultation it offers the advantages of patient and surgeon convenience and shorter waiting times. It is, however, dependent on the skill and experience of the operator who needs to be suitably trained to perform it.

Ultrasound Guided Injections

What is known from the Literature?

  • There is disagreement regarding the efficacy and effectiveness of Injection Therapy in painful shoulder, (Heijiden 1996 and Green 2003).
  • Jones (1993), Eustace, (1997) and Yamakado (2002) have demonstrated poor accuracy of steroid placement from palpation guided injection techniques.
  • High-resolution ultrasound has proven accurate and reliable in diagnosing a wide range of shoulder disorders compared with clinical examination, MRI and Arthrogram (Dinnes, Loveman, McIntyre and Waught 2003).
  • It’s accuracy, safety, and simplicity for guiding interventional procedures has been widely described, Koski (2000), Balint (2002), Ziegler (2004), Zwar (2004), Grassi (2001) and Sofka (2000).

The Problem

  • At present variation in the administration technique of steroid injection at the shoulder exists. (Haslock 1995)
  • Clinical experience supported by evidence suggests that while some patients respond dramatically well to subacromial injection (Adebajo 1990, Blair 1996), others respond poorly and some not at all (White 1 996).
  • This may be due to mis-placed injections or mis-diagnosis, since 30% of blind subacromial injections miss the bursa in expert hands (Eustace, 1997 , Sethi, 2006 , Yamakado, 2002 , Henkus, 2006 )
  • The problem is genuine uncertainty as to best practice.

Ultrasound vs. Blind Injection of the subacromial bursa

Naredo E, Cabero F Beneyto P, Cruz A, Mondejar B, Uson J, Palop M, Crespo M.(2004)

  • Design – Randomized Cohort.
  • To determine whether blind injection or U/S guided injection is more effective as regards reduced pain & improved function in shoulder pain pts.
  • Main Results – 41 patients randomized to 2 groups.
    • Ultrasound before & after interventions. Reassessed at 6/52.
    • Outcome Measures-VAS (p0.001) SFA (p0.012)
    • Nocturnal Pain Active & Passive m/mts.
  • Outcome –
    • The study had clinical and statistically significant results.
    • Ultrasonography can improve the diagnosis, accuracy and ultimate effectiveness of Injection Therapy.
    • Ultrasonography injection is superior to blind injection.
    • Ultrasonography-guided injection is to be considered when previous anatomically guided injection has failed.
    • Good randomization, justified blinding measures and similar population groups provided good reliability and external validity to the study. The results were generalizable to my clinical population. The author acknowledged the study weaknesses and rationalized the threats to the internal validity of history and maturation. The study had clinical and statistically significant results.

Implications for Practice

  • The use of ultrasound to diagnose and to deliver the injection in shoulder pain patients is superior to blind injections to increase pain relief and shoulder function.
  • Ultrasonography can improve the diagnosis, accuracy and ultimate effectiveness of Injection Therapy.
  • Ultrasonography-guided injection is to be considered when previous anatomically guided injection has failed.

Ultrasound Guided Injection of Subacromial Bursa

(click on image for flash video)